Leader Identity Under AI
Identity in the Work is the framework behind the AI-for-leaders question. It names what is being argued about when alarmists and enthusiasts trade evidence about AI in senior work: the extent to which the leader’s specific judgement, voice and values are present in the output the AI helps produce. This was named through ChangeSchool’s work with senior leaders across our executive education programmes, as part of the modular blocks of our AI for Leaders curriculum. It is the framing piece for the series.
The Identity Dial framework
A named axis runs from identity-absent (workslop) at one pole to identity-total (identic AI) at the other. Every AI-assisted output sets the dial somewhere. The disciplines are the deliberate moves along it.
​
Three positions on one dial.
​
​
The Identity Dial, three positions on a single axis: identity absent, identity present, identity total.
​
Identity absent, the workslop end. Output that looks acceptable enough to send and is generic enough that anyone could have produced it from the same prompt. The model’s centre fills the space the leader did not occupy. Kate Niederhoffer and Jeff Hancock at BetterUp and Stanford (fall 2025) put 53% of knowledge workers as senders of work they consider below their own standard, about 2 hours of cost shifted to each receiver, about $9M per year per 10,000-person company. Harvard Business Review (24 September 2025) published AI-Generated Workslop Is Destroying Productivity, treating workslop as a defining problem in AI-at-work thought leadership.
Identity present, the middle. A leader’s judgement, selectively and deliberately, shaping the work at specific points. The realistic territory for most senior leaders most weeks.
The dial here is set by discipline rather than by default; without the disciplines the series names, the middle drifts toward whichever pole the environment rewards, almost always the absent end.
​
Identity total, the identic AI end. A personal proxy, built deliberately on the leader’s corpus, governed by the leader’s values and overrides, that reproduces the leader’s judgement at scale. Tapscott and Bradley (2026), You to the Power of Two, describe Tapscott’s working personal agent (about 500 documents) as the worked example. The deliberate version is a discipline; the accidental version is a drift in the same direction, on someone else’s terms.
​
The axis is not a moral line. The middle is the realistic territory. Both poles are specific, named failure or success modes. The series exists because the path along the dial is not continuous; it is a sequence of disciplines, named one by one.
​
Genesis
The two poles are externally named: workslop (Niederhoffer and Hancock, fall 2025) and identic AI (Tapscott and Bradley, 2026). The axis itself, and the reading that the disciplines of senior leadership in the AI era are specific moves along it, is the ChangeSchool contribution. Anchored in the deeper argument that judgement is a faculty exercised at points along a dial, not a binary the leader either has or has not.
​
Why it matters now
Without the axis named, leaders read alarmist and enthusiast writing without a frame that reconciles them. They drift defensively in either direction. Performance pressure, speed culture, and the generic register fluent corporate writing has settled into all reward the absent end. Most leaders spend most weeks closer to the absent pole than they would choose if they could see the choice. The axis has to be named before it can be resisted.
​
How ChangeSchool applies it with executives
We run senior cohorts through the Identity Audit in three-hour cohort sessions. Each leader brings three real pieces of AI-assisted work and scores each on three dimensions, one to five each: judgement (does it reflect the specific evaluations and distinctions the leader would have made?), voice (does it sound like the leader writing?), values (does it reflect what the leader would include and refuse to include?). They average the three, plot the pattern across the three pieces, and identify the discipline in the series that addresses the gap most directly. Each leader leaves with one sentence written: next time I do this kind of work, I want the dial set at X, and the specific move that gets me there is Y. They commit to one move before the next cohort session.
​
The discipline
Every AI-assisted output sets the dial somewhere. The discipline is the willingness to make the setting deliberate. The series names twenty-three moves along the axis; this piece names the axis. Knowing the axis is what makes any of the twenty-three moves more than a tactic.
​
​
​
‘Every AI-assisted output is already on a dial running from your absence to your presence; the discipline is whether you set the dial or it sets
itself.’
​
​
Viren Lall, Managing Director,
ChangeSchool LDN (2026).
virenlall.com/leader-identity-under-ai
​
​
​
AI for Leaders.
Executive Education that changes practice.
Viren Lall is Managing Director of ChangeSchool LDN, a London-based executive education partner. ChangeSchool specialises in AI for senior-leader development, winning the EFMD Global Excellence in Practice Award in 2023 and 2025, with programmes in 39 countries.
​
Since April 2024, ChangeSchool LDN has been designing and delivering mindset shifts through Executive Education Programmes across sectors such as deep tech, manufacturing, and education, for business owners, governance professionals, and senior leaders. Leaders gain AI fluency, protect decision quality, spot value creation opportunities, and foster human-centric AI use. AI capability for senior leaders is also a core element and a constant spine of our Open Programmes for Chief Digital Officers, Chief Operating Officers, and Chief People Officers, delivered by our partner business schools.
Some of our clients include the Royal Academy of Engineering, Education and Training Foundation, and the UK Government's Meet Smart programme.
For speaking, programme, or partnership enquiries, get in touch with him through ChangeSchool LDN.